Tuesday 16 July 2024
Proving the blasphemy of Muawiyah with authentic-document narratives!
ID: 491 Publish Date: 04 January 2017 - 16:12 Count Views: 3001
Speeches » VelayatTv
Proving the blasphemy of Muawiyah with authentic-document narratives!

velayat tv - October 30, 2016



 In The Name Of God

Date: October 30, 2016


In the name of god. Hello to you, dear and vulnerable viewers of “Velayat” global channel. You’re watching “Habl al-Matin” live program. I wish success and happiness for all of you. We ask god almighty to put loving towards commander of the faithful [AS] in our heart and the heart of our children.

These days are the days of the captivity of “Al Allah” and Imam “Hussayn” [AS]’s mourning ceremonies are still holding. Many are preparing themselves going to Karbala attending “Arbaeen” marching.

“30001203” is our short message system “SMS” and belongs to those who live in “Iran”. This way they can message us easily. Be sure that we receive your texts and if I can I’ll read them during live broadcast program. Dear master is here, Hello.

Ayatollah “Qazwini”:

I express my sincere greeting along with permanent success to all dear viewers worldwide.


Thank you dear master. A while ago we began our discussion about “Muawiyah”. Our dear viewers wanted us to look into the personality of “Muawiyah” and his role in martyring Imam “Hussayn” [AS].

In fact the role of “Yazid” {may god damn him} is quite clear. But we proved that “Muawiyah” has played role in martyring Imam “Hussayn” [AS] and we also proved that there isn’t any authentic narrative about his virtue.

What we say are all from Sunni resources and we quoted issues from Sahaba and early scholars showing that “Muawiyah” has been dispraised.

One of issues which has been restated in Sunni books is about damning “Muawiyah” done by Prophet Muhammad [PBUH] that we quoted them in the last session.

If we want to say the truth, we don’t have to look at “Muawiyah” as one “Sahaba” at all and we can say seriously that his infidelity could be proved as we did in the last programs. In another word this guy is out of Islam.

I said a summary of last program to prepare your mind; I want dear Sunnis who call us to answer this question:

In your opinion if “Yazid” and “Muawiyah” had any role in martyring Imam “Hussayn” [AS]?! How much are they involved in his martyrdom? You can even determine their role by saying a percentage.

Dear master! A narrative has been quoted from Prophet [PBUH]. We want to see if this Hadith: «یمُوتُ مُعَاوِیةُ عَلَی غَیرِ مِلَّتِی» which means “Muawiyah” died Non-Muslim- is written in Sunni resources or not?! According to this narrative Muawiyah’s death is a Non-Muslim’s death.

Ayatollah Qazwini”:

As our dear said we don’t know “Muawiyah” as Sahaba. Commander of the faithful [AS] says in “Nahj al-Balagha” letter 16:

«فَوَ الَّذِی فَلَقَ الْحَبَّةَ وَ بَرَأَ النَّسَمَةَ مَا أَسْلَمُوا وَ لَکنِ اسْتَسْلَمُوا وَ أَسَرُّوا الْکفْرَ فَلَمَّا وَجَدُوا أَعْوَاناً رَجَعُوا إِلَی عَدَوَاتِهِمْ»

Swear by god “Muawiyah” and his companions didn’t convert to Islam at all, they pretended to be Muslim and hid their blasphemy and now that they have some forces {in the battle of Siffin} they showed their infidelity.

Nahj al-Balagha- p 374- letter 16

This issue has been said in “Majma’ al-Zawa’id” book quoted by “Ammar Yasir”:

«والله ما أسلموا ولکن استسلموا وأسروا الکفر فلما رأو علیه أعوانا أظهروه»

Then Mr.”Haythami” says:

«وسعد بن حذیفة لم أر من ترجمه»

I’ve not seen anyone to translate “Sa’d ibn Hudhayfa”.

“Ali ibn abi Bakr al-Haythami”- Majma’ al-Zaw’id wa Manba’ al-Fawa’id- v 1, p 113

We don’t want to say that he said it deliberately, perhaps his mind didn’t serve him well; but you take a look at “Al-Thuqat” book from “Ibn Habban”. In the fourth volume of this book he’s said that “Sa’d ibn Hudhayfah” is amongst reliable guys!

Mr.”Haythami” died in 807 AH and “Ibn Habban” died in 354 AH, there is much distance between them. Despite of “Ibn Habban” has translated him in “Al-Thuqat” book four hundred years before him, “Al-Hayhami” says: I didn’t see anyone to translate him!! {saying he’s reliable}

“Ali Sami al-Nashar” who is amongst Sunni big scholars and faith is Shafi’i”, says:

«فان الرجل لم یؤمن ابداً بالاسلام»

Muawiyah never became Muslim.

“Nas’at al-Fikr al-Falsafi fi al-Islam”- v 2, p 18

The biography of “Ali Sami al-Nashar” is written in “Wikipedia”:

«أحد کبار المفکرین الإسلامیین فی القرن العشرین»

He’s one of the biggest thoughtful guys in 20th century.

«کان عالما کبیرا شافعی المذهب»

It even says: some elders say that he’s the boss of “Asha’irah” in current age; this guy is not Shia but Sunni scholars don’t say such things about “Muawiyah”.

When theY call us they sometimes call him: “leader Muawiyah” and defend him!! Several days ago dear Sunni called and said: I became Shia because one day I went beside the grave of “Hujr ibn Udi” and saw that it’s written there:

«حجر بن عدی (رضی الله عنه) قتل بأمر معاویة (رضی الله عنه)»

This issue is laughable! We don’t know what to say to these guys. a guy orders someone to be killed then both killer and slain are said “may god be pleased of him”!! So what is the instance of this holy verse?

(وَ مَنْ یقْتُلْ مُؤْمِناً مُتَعَمِّداً فَجَزاؤُهُ جَهَنَّمُ خالِداً فی‌ها)

The recompense for he who kills a believer deliberately is Hell, he is eternal there.

Sura An-Nisa- verse 93

As for the hadith you mentioned, it’s been quoted in “Masa’il imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal” book narrated by “Isaac ibn Abraham Nishapuri” searched by “Zuhayr Shawish”:

«سمعت علی بن جعد یقول مات والله معاویة علی غیر الاسلام»

I heard of “Ali ibn Ju’d” who said: swear by god “Muawiyah” died Non-Muslim.

I’ll talk about “Ali ibn Ju’d” later. And this narrative in “Genealogies of the Nobles” book from “Al-Baladhuri” vol. 5, p 126:

«کنْتُ عِنْدَ النَّبِی صَلَّی اللَّهُ عَلَیهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَقَالَ: [یطْلُعُ عَلَیکمْ مِنْ هَذَا الْفَجِّ رَجُلٌ یمُوتُ عَلَی غَیرِ مِلَّتِی،»«قَالَ: وَکنْتُ تَرَکتُ أَبِی قَدْ وُضِعَ لَهُ وَضُوءٌ، فَکنْتُ کحَابِسِ الْبَوْلِ مَخَافَةَ أَنْ یجِیءَ،»«قَالَ: فَطَلَعَ مُعَاوِیةُ فَقَالَ النَّبِی صَلَّی اللَّهُ عَلَیهِ وَسَلَّمَ: هُوَ هَذَا] »

We were with Prophet Muhammad [PBUH] who said: someone will come here right now who will die Non-Muslim. Narrator says: “Muawiyah” came in and Prophet [PBUH] said: the guy who I was talking about who will die Non-Muslim is him.

Studying the document of this narrative:

We look into the narrators of this narrative one by one:

In “Taqrib al-Tahzib” book from “Ibn Hajar Asqalani”, he says that “Ishaq ibn Mansur” who is the narrator of “Sahih Bukhari”, “Sahih Muslim”, “Sunan at-Tirmidhi”, “Sunan ibn Majah”, is reliable.

“Abd ar-Razzaq San’ani” the master of “Bukhari” who is amongst the narrators of “Sihah Sitta”. “Ibn Hajar” says about him:

«ثقة حافظ و کان یتشیع»

“Taqrib al-Tahzib”- vol. 1, p 354

He says that “Abd ar-Razzaq San’ani” is Shia while “Yahya ibn Ma’in” says in “Tahzib al-Tahzib” book:

«لو ارتد عبد الرزاق ما ترکنا حدیثه»

If “Abd ar-Razzaq” even becomes apostate, we won’t leave his narratives.

“Tahzib al-Tahzib”- vol. 6- p 280

We have said this narrative several times that Mr.”Abd ar-Razzaq San’ani” was sitting that some said the name of “Muawiyah”; he said:

 «لا تقذر مجلسنا بذکر ولد أبی سفیان»

Don’t make our ceremony “Najes” by saying the name the son of “Abu Sufyan”.

“Al-Dhahabi”- Siyar al-A’lam al-Nubala’- v 9- p 570

And also “Ma’ammar ibn Rashid” who amongst the narrators of “Sahih Bukhari”, “Sahi Muslim” and other Sihah. “IbnHajar Asqalani” says about him:

«ثقة ثبت فاضل»

“Ibn Hajar Asqalani” -Taqrib al-Tahzib, vol. 1, p 541

It’s also said about “Abdullah ibn Tavus”:

«ثقة فاضل عابد»

“IbnHajar Asqalani” -Taqrib al-Tahzib, vol. 1, p 308

Such sentence is written in “Siyar al-A’lam al-Nubala” book. And “Abdullah ibn Amr ‘As” is one of “Sahaba” undoubtedly.

“Abdullah ibn Amr ‘As” is the first narrator of this narrative, they say about Sahaba: “They are beyond reliability!” next narrator is “Abdullah ibn Tavus” that “Al-Duhahabu” and “Ibn Hajar” say that he’s “learned and reliable”.

Next narrator is “Ma’ammar ibn Rashid” that he been said “learned and reliable”, same goes for “Abd ar-Razzaq San’ani”, next one is “Jacob ibn Mansur” who was said “reliable”. So all the narrators of this narrative are reliable.

I say this narrative again and I ask dears to listen carefully. It’s written in “Genealogies of the Nobles” book, vol. 5, p 126  from “Al-Baladhuri” that Prophet [PBUH] said: someone will come here who will die Non-Muslim, in another word he will die as infidel, then “Muawiyah” came in!!

This book {in which this narrative is written} is not “Kafi” {Shia book} that you insult its author Shaykh “Kulayni” or “Tahzib” book that you insult Shaykh “Tusi” or “Man la yahduruhu Faqih” book that you insult Shaykh “Saduq” and it’s not “Bihar al-Anvar” book that you insult “Allamah Majlisi”.

This book is written by “Al-Baladhuri” which is amongst big Sunni scholars and the document of this narrative is authentic undoubtedly.

It’s written in “Al-Nujum al-Zahira fi Muluk al-Misr wa’l-Qahira” book. vol. 1, p 164 from “Mr. Atabaki” which is one of Sunni books; that when “Yazid” went to the Hell, his son went on the pulpit and said:

«أیها الناس، إن جدی معاویة نازع الأمر أهله ومن هو أحق به منه لقرابته من رسول الله صلی الله علیه وسلم وهو علی بن أبی طالب»«ورکب بکم ما تعلمون»«حتی أتته منیته، فصار فی قبره رهیناً بذنوبه وأسیراً بخطایاه»«ثم قلد أبی الأمر فکان غیر أهل لذلک، ورکب هواه وأخلفه الأمل، وقصر عنه الأجل. وصار فی قبره رهیناً بذنوبه، وأسیراً بجرمه»«ثم بکی حتی جرت دموعه علی خدیه»«ثم قال: إن من أعظم الأمور علینا علمنا بسوء مصرعه وبئس منقلبه»«وقد قتل عترة رسول الله صلی الله علیه وسلم وأباح الحرم وخرب الکعبة»

O people! My grandfather “Muawiyah” argued with “Ali ibn abi Talib” on the matter of caliphate while “Ali” was right because he was close to Prophet [PBUH]. He imposed himself on people until he died, he went to grave while he’s the captive of his errors. After him my father “Yazid” wasn’t qualified becoming caliph, he rode his passion and lust and went to grave and is the captive of sins and crime.

Then he cried in a way that his tears appeared on his cheek and said: I know that my father is faced the worst punishment in the worst place and is in the worst spot. He martyred prophet [PBUH]’s “Ahl al-Bayt” and made “Haram” things “Halal” and destroyed god’s house.

This narrative is so interesting! I say that our channel is not a political channel and we’re not interested in talking about political issues; but we talk about what is related to Wahhabism.

Currently Wahhabism is known as the evil center, like “Saudi Arabia” which has made whole the world insecure.

This afternoon my friends sent me some articles from “Italy” and “England” that these country’s newspapers have introduced “Saudi Arabia” as the factor of terrorist.

Currently this country has caused insecurity in the world and made many innocent children and women to die, about 8 articles were sent to me from these two countries.


According to last statistics about ten thousand kids were killed by “Saudi Arabia” mercenaries.

Ayatollah “Qazwini”:

This disaster has become stigma for “Human rights organization”!! They announced that’s true that “Saudi Arabia” has committed war crime and has killed innocent kids, but if we condemn this country, they will cut off our income and we can’t run this organization!! You should change the name of your organization to “Criminals rights organization!!


And several days ago this “Saudi Arabia” was selected as one of the members “Human right organization”!

Ayatollah “Qazwini”:

This work is like putting wolf as the shepherd of sheep herd!! Some would say that Imam “Husayn” [AS] negotiated with “Umar Sa’d” so, we should negotiate with “America”.

Firstly such sentences are betraying Imam “Husayn” [AS]. He didn’t negotiate with them if he talked to enemy it was as performing formula. In his last sayings, Imam “Husayn” [AS] discussed his rightfulness and that he was oppressed, he said explicitly:

«یا شِیعَةَ آلِ أَبِی سُفْیان إِنْ لَمْ یکنْ لَکمْ دِینٌ وَ کنْتُمْ لَا تَخَافُونَ الْمَعَادَ فَکونُوا أَحْرَاراً فِی دُنْیاکمْ»

O Shia of “Al Abu Sufyan”! If you’re unbeliever and aren’t afraid of day of resurrection, at least be chivalrous.

“Allameh Majlesi”- Bihar al-Anwar- vol.45 - p 51

Or he says:

«إِنَّ الدَّعِی ابْنَ الدَّعِی قَدْ رَکزَ بَینَ اثْنَتَینِ بَینَ السَّلَّةِ وَ الذِّلَّةِ وَ هَیهَاتَ مِنَّا الذِّلَّة»

This adulterate the son of adulterate has made me to choose between glory and abjection, swear by god I don’t accept abjection.

“Bihar al-Anwar”- vol. 45- p 9

Is this negotiation?!  When he wanted to move from “Median”, Imam “Husayn” [AS] wrote a will to his brother “Muhammad ibn Hanafiyah” and condemned Yazid’s government. In his speech in “Mecca”, Imam Husayn [AS] said such things and on his way to “Karbala” he speechified against dynasty of “Banu Ummayah”. When he faced “Hurr”, he said:

«أَ لَا تَرَوْنَ الْحَقَّ لَا یعْمَلُ بِه وَ الْبَاطِلَ لَا یتَنَاهَی عَنْهُ»

Don’t you see that right isn’t practiced and evil is not avoided.

Allameh Majlesi- Bihar al-Anwar- v 44- p 192

Imam “Husayn” [AS] says: “These guys destroyed Prophet [PBUH]’s Sunnah and arose against Quran.” All these things are clearly seen in his sayings.

We try to put the names of newspapers and international media that said issues against “Saudi Arabia” on “Valiasr” institute website and “Velayat” global channel website.

God willing, I’ll talk about “Saudi Arabia” crimes during the history that maybe their crimes in “Yemen” are nothing compared to the.

For instance, they arrested some seniors of “Matir”, elders went there to mediate, food was cooked and table was set, they cut the head of prisoners and put it on the food and told elders: “Help yourself.” These guys didn’t accept eating food and king of “Saudi Arabia” ordered their head to be cut and put beside other heads!!

Next week I’ll talk about “The fatwa of Wahhabis’ muftis about killing Non-Muslims”.

They say that we have to kill Non-Muslims including Christians and Jews in all countries. Their women and girls must be taken captive until these guys obey Islam.


So, these Wahhabis do not just massacre Shias!

Ayatollah “Qazwini”:

No, they don’t, they think that Wahhabis are only Muslims on the earth. They believe that Shia must be killed as well as anyone who is not Wahhabi.

Those who tied explosive belt and blew themselves up in “France” or “Germany” or “Belgium” followed the Fatwa of Wahhabis like” “Bin Baz”, “Ibn Athimain”, “Ibn Taymiyyah” and “Muhammad ibn abd al-Wahhab”.

They believe that killing anyone who is not Wahhabi is compulsory. Keep this point in your mind they say:” we should take captive Non-Muslim women and girls!!”

I say to dear people of “Afghanistan” that these guys planned to change their headquarter from “Syria” and “Iraq” to “Afghanistan” because they failed to reach their goals in those countries. They were ordered to do so!!

Shias and Sunnis in “Afghanistan” must be careful. If these guys come to your country will have no mercy towards Shia, Sunni, Christian and Jew.

If they come to “Afghanistan”, they’ll remove security completely. Be careful and stand against those who support “ISIS” and Salafis and throw them out of your country whatever it takes.

Don’t let devil to make nest in your country. Dear Shias and anyone who is hearing me worldwide know that they want to destroy “Kaaba” with Zionism’s association.

They want to fire a missile from “Yemen” to “Kaaba” and say that “Houthis” of Yemen destroyed “Kaaba!” these things aren’t important to them, what matter to them is the survival of their corrupted government.

Apparently there are evidences that show that they want to do so. I don’t show evidence right now but I’ll do so if it’s necessary or I’ll give them to Mr.”Abul Ghasimi” to announce that they want to destroy “Kaaba” by missile saying that “Houthis” or “Iran” did so.

 As “Muawiyah” who put “Quran” on the spear and chanted the voice of innocence, they want to do so after destroying “Kaaba” by missile.


Thank you dear master. Next question is that if this narrative «إِنَّ مُعَاوِیةَ فِی تَابُوتٍ مِنْ نَار» in which “Muawiyah” has been dispraised is written in Sunni books or not?

Ayatollah “Qazwini”:

This narrative is written in numerous books. I say this narrative from a book that is faultless in terms of document.

It’s written in “Genealogies of the Nobles” book, vol. 5, p 128, that “Khalaf ibn Hisham” quotes from “Abu Awanah” and him from “A’mash” and he quotes from “Salim ibn abi Ja’d” that:

«قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّی اللَّهُ عَلَیهِ وَسَلَّمَ: مُعَاوِیةُ فِی تَابُوتٍ مُقْفَلٍ عَلَیهِ فِی جَهَنَّمَ»

Prophet Muhammad [PBUH] said: “Muawiyah is in locked coffin in the Hell.

It’s written in many narratives that “Muawiyah” is in the Hell the lowest place just one degree higher than “Pharaoh” and it’s because “Pharaoh” said that I’m god but “Muawiyah” didn’t do so.

As for looking into this narrative’s narrators written in “Genealogies of the Nobles” book, first narrator is “Abu Awanah al-Wuzah al-Yaskuri”. It’s written about him in “Tahzib al-Kamal”:

«أبو عوانة صحیح الکتاب کثیر العجم والنقط کان ثبتا وأبو عوانة فی جمیع حاله أصح حدیثا عندنا من شعبة وقال أبو طالب سئل أحمد بن حنبل أبو عوانة أثبت أو شریک قال إذا حدث أبو عوانة من کتابه فهو أثبت»

«وحدیث یزید بن عطاء ضعیف ثبت أبو عوانة وسقط مولاه یزید وقال أبو زرعة ثقة إذا حدث من کتابه وقال أبو حاتم کتبه صحیحة وإذا حدث من حفظه غلط کثیرا وهو صدوق ثقة»

“Abu al-Hajjaj al-Mizzi”- “Tahzib al-Kamal” – vol. 30, p 446

Second narrator is “A’mash”, it’s written about him in “Tazkirah al-Huffaz”:

«وکان رأساً فی العلم النافع والعلم الصالح»

“Al-Dhahabi”- Tazkirah al-Huffaz- v 1, p 166

Next narrator is “Khalaf ibn Hashim”, it’s written about him:

«هو والله عندنا الثقة الأمین شرب أو لم یشرب»

“Al-Mizzi”- Tahzib al-Kamal- v 8, p 301

Next narrator of this narrative is “Salim ibn abi Ja’d”, it’s written about him:

«قال إسحاق بن منصور عن یحیی بن معین وأبو زرعة والنسائی ثقة»

“Al-Mizzi”- Tahzib al-Kamal- v 10, p 132

Assuming that these guys have been told “unreliable” as well, there is principle in “Rejal” science that if a narrative has been told both “reliable” and “unreliable”, his narrative will be “Hassan” {a narrative that its narrators are “Imami-faith” and have been praised, it’s called “Hasan” because we’re optimistic towards its document}.

“Tabari” who is accepted by Sunnis says:

«إن معاویة فی تابوت من نار فی أسفل درک»

“Muawiyah” is in a coffin made by fire in the lowest spot of the Hell.

“Tabari” - Tarikh Tabari- vol. p 622

It’s written about “Ali ibn al-Ju’d” in “Su’alat” book, vol. 1, p 254 from “Abu Ubayd ‘Ajari aba Dawoud al-Sajestani”

«الجوهری، البغدادی، ثقة ثبت، رمی بالتشیع»

If someone says such thing about “Muawiyah”, they say: “He’s definitely been Shia”.

And it’s written about next narrator “Umar ibn Marzuq”:

«ثقة له أوهام»

“Abu Ubayd ‘Ajari aba Dawud al-Sajestani”- Su’alat – vol. 1, p 254

“Ali ibn Ju’d” who is reliable, says:

«ما ضرنی أن یعذب الله معاویة»

I’m not afraid at all to believe that god almighty punishes “Muawiyah”.

“Abu Ubayd ‘Ajari aba Dawud al-Sajestani”- Su’alat – vol. 1, p 254

These issues are quite clear. On evil Wahhabi channels, when Wahhabis want to reject a narrative, they say: “narrator is Shia and we don’t accept it.”
as for some guys who say that “Aban ibn Taghlab” is Shia or exaggerator Shia, Mr.”Al-Dhahabi” says:

«فلو رد حدیث هؤلاء»«لذهب جملة من الاثار النبویة وهذه مفسدة بینة»

If we want to reject narratives written in our books quoted by Shias, all remnants of “Nabawiyyah” will be destroyed and it’s clear corruption.

“Al-Dahahabi”- Mizan al-I’tidal- vol. 1, p 118

Mr.”Khatib Baghdadi” says in “Al-Kifaya” book which is one Sunni prominent books: if we want to reject the narratives of people of “Kufa” because they’re Shia, our books will be destroyed.” He says explicitly if we want to remove their narratives, no book will remain for us!!

And “Ibn Hajar Asqalani” says:

«لولا رجلان من الشیعة ما صح لهم حدیث»

If you remove two Shia narrators from books, you will no longer have reliable narrator.

«عباد بن یعقوب وإبراهیم بن محمد بن میمون». قال الدارقطني: «شیعی صدوق»

“Tahzib at-Tahzib”- vol. 5, p 95

These issues are quite clear. I’ve already said that some of masters of “Bukhari” and “Muslim” were Shia. What will remain in “Sahih Bukhari” and “Sahih Muslim” books if you remove the narratives of Shia narrators?!

From one side when they want to discard both narrator and narrative they say narrator is Shia and discard narrative, then they say: “If we remove Shia narratives, our house will be destroyed!!” {nothing will remain from our narratives}


Thank you very much, so far we’ve looked into two Hadiths in “Habl al-Matin” live broadcast program,

First Hadith:

«یمُوتُ مُعَاوِیةُ عَلَی غَیرِ مِلَّتِی»

Its clear meaning is that “Muawiyah” dies Non-Muslim;

Second narrative:

«إِنَّ مُعَاوِیةَ فِی تَابُوتٍ مِنْ نَار»

Ayatollah “Qazwini”:

I’ve said several times that our motto is this saying of “Ayatollah Sistani”:

«لا تقولوا اخواننا اهل السنة، بل قولوا أنفسنا أهل السنة»

Don’t say Sunni brothers but say dear Sunnis!

We believe that insulting Sahaba is unforgivable and cardinal sin, but “Muawiyah” is not amongst “Sahaba”. This is what Sunni elders say. Any narrative that I said in last sessions was from Sunni books.

We also tried to look into document of narrative so that they don’t say that this narrative is invalid.


Thank you, Sunnis have always been dear to us and will be; these issues are realities written in history. many of those who call us admit that “Muawiyah” is different than others.

If you are Shia and call us, please explain to us about the imamate of commander of the faithful [AS] from Quran and narratives briefly and then ask your questions.

And our dear Sunnis answer this question before asking questions that how much you think “Muawiyah” was involved in martyring Imam “Husayn” [AS].

Each one of these questions is for our Shia or Sunni dears, I want them to answer our question briefly and then they can ask their question related to the topic of conversation.

Viewers’ contracts:

Viewer {“Mr. Muhammadi”- Shia}

I say hello to master “Qazwini” and Mr.”Isma’ily”. as for the sixth letter of “Nahj al-Balgha” book, I saw that this letter has written in “Akhbar al-Tawal” from “Dinwari”. And “Dinwari” died 77 years {282 AH} earlier than Seyed “Murtaza” {359 AH}. I want to know that if it’s possible that “Seyad Murtaza” has taken this issue from Dinwari’s book  which is a Sunni book?!


Thank you “Mr. Muhammadi”, we’ll respond you.

Viewer: {“Ms. Azimi”- Shia}

Hello to “Mr. Isma’ili” and master “Qazwini”. I heard that when “Muawiyah” died, a cross was seen hanging on neck. I want to know if it’s true or not?!


Thank you, we’ll respond your question.

Viewer: {Jawad- Shia}:

Hello, I called “Kalamah” channel and said: “give ten seconds till I say what want to say”, but after two seconds they interrupted me.

On this channel you respond Sunnis and let them talking but Wahhabi experts scare. If they let commoner Shias like me to talk, they’ll be decried.

These guys repeat their sayings ten times and interrupt Shia and don’t let Shias to talk at all. They’re so impudent despite all this savagery and massacre in the world they’re trying to show that they’re right.


Thank you “Jawad”, hello to next viewer:

Viewer: {Behruz-Shia}

Hello, I have a question from master “Qazwini”, I have a Sunni friend who is “Hanafi”. He promised me to become Shia if Master “Qazwini” says a Hadith from Sunni books that damned “Yazid” would drink wine and was libertine. He’s watching the program.


Thank you for you calling.

Viewer: {Ali- Shia}

Hello. At first I answer your question about proving Imam “Ali” [AS]’s imamate. Quran says:

(یا أَیهَا الرَّسُولُ بَلِّغْ ما أُنْزِلَ إِلَیک مِنْ رَبِّک وَ إِنْ لَمْ تَفْعَلْ فَما بَلَّغْتَ رِسالَتَهُ وَ اللَّهُ یعْصِمُک مِنَ النَّاسِ إِنَّ اللَّهَ لا یهْدِی الْقَوْمَ الْکافِرِینَ)

O Messenger, deliver what is sent down to you from your Lord; if you do not, you will not have conveyed His Message. Allah protects you from the people. Allah does not guide the nation, the unbelievers.

Sura Al-Maeda- verse 67

“Suyuti” says in “Durr al-Manthur” book that this verse is about commander of the faithful [AS].

You asked another question in this program that I answer it with a question from dear master. You asked about Muawiyah’s role in “Ashura” uprising.

Dear master I want to ask you a question; you said several times that insulting Sunnis’ sanctities is Haram, but remember Imam “Husayn” [AS]’s saying on the day of “Ashura” when he had fallen in {shamble} whole, he said: “Abu-Bakr” and “Umar” are amongst those who caused event of “Ashura”. I want to know master’s opinion about this saying of Imam “Husayn” [AS] written in “Maqatal” book from Seyed ibn Tavus” and “Allameh Majlesi”?

And I want to know master’s opinion about “Acquittance” which is amongst minor principles of religion and the pillars of Imamate and aversion of Imam “Ali” [AS]’s enemies.


It’s not good that we discuss morality issues, but aquittance of Imam “Ali” [AS]’s enemies is quite clear, we’ll talk about it, goodbye.

 “Mr.”Muhammadi” asked about Hadrat “Ali” [AS]’s letter and said: is that possible that “Sayed Razi” has gotten this narrative from Sunni resources?!

Ayatollah “Qazwini”:

“Sayed Razi” is amongst grandees of fourth and fifth centuries and we can’t say that he was unaware of Shia and Sunni resources. He has said issues from valid resources regardless being Shia or Sunni. In this letter commander of the faithful [AS] proves the blasphemy of “Muawiyah” and restates in the last part of the letter:

«فَإِنْ أَبَی قَاتَلُوهُ عَلَی اتِّبَاعِهِ غَیرَ سَبِیلِ الْمُؤْمِنِینَ وَ وَلَّاهُ اللَّهُ مَا تَوَلَّی وَ لَعَمْرِی»

“Nahj al-Balagha”- p 367- v 6

On the other hand Hadrat “Ali” writes a letter to “Muawiyah” and says: Muawiyah! You who don’t accept me as appointed Imam by Prophet [PBUH]. You don’t swear allegiance with me and say: “Muhajirin” and “Ansar” didn’t swear allegiance; while “Muhajirin” and “Ansar” who swore allegiance with “Abu-Bakr” and “Umar”, swore allegiance with me too. If your criterion is “Ansar” and “Muhajirin” allegiance, they swore allegiance, why don’t you swear allegiance with me?!”

What interesting is that Sunni elders and scholars such as “Mr. Kharizmi” who says in “Al-Manaqib” book, p 202 that commander of the faithful Ali [AS]’s letter to “Muawiyah” is for performing formula!

And they say that it’s written in this letter:

«وَ إِنَّمَا الشُّورَی لِلْمُهَاجِرِینَ وَ الْأَنْصَار»

“Nahj al-Balgha”- p 367- Hadith No. 6

We say as well:

وَ إِنَّمَا الشُّورَی لِلْمُهَاجِرِینَ وَ الْأَنْصَار”!

Were commander of the faithful Ali [AS], Imam “Hasan” [AS], Imam “Husayn” [AS], “Salman”, “Abu dhar”, and others amongst “Muhajirin” and “Ansar” or not?!

If all “Muhajirin” and “Ansar” including Hadrat “Ali” [AS] and Hadrat “Fatimah” swear allegiance with someone, we say as well that he’s right Imam!

It’s written in “Sahih Bukhari” book: commander of the faithful [AS] didn’t swear allegiance with “Abu-Bakr” until 6 months.

“Ibn Hazm Andalusi” says in “Al-Muhalli” book, vol. 9, p 345:

«ولعنة اللّه على كلّ إجماع يخرج عنه على بن أبى طالب ومن بحضرته من الصحابة»

He says that “Dinwari” has written this sentence. “Ibn Muzahim” says in “Event of Siffin” book, vol. 1, p 29, but it begins with this sentence:

«فَإِنَّ بَیعَتِی بِالْمَدِینَةِ لَزِمَتْک وَ أَنْتَ بِالشَّامِ»

People of “Medina” swore me allegiance and you have to do so in “Sham”.

This is what’s written in the first of letter 6 of “Nahj al-Balagha”, all of those who have written this sentence have said this expression too. Why “Seyed Razi” hasn’t write this sentence, we don’t know, but we’re quoting it from Sunni books.

“Ibn Qutayba Dinwari” has said this expression in “Imamate and policy” book, p 80.

This sentence is also written in “Al-Futuh” book from “Ahmad ibn A’sam”.

This sentence is written in all books and it begins with this sentence:

فَإِنَّ بَیعَتِی بِالْمَدِینَةِ لَزِمَتْک وَ أَنْتَ بِالشَّامِ

It’s quite clear! If you read this letter meticulously, blasphemy of “Muawiyah” is proved in each line of this letter.


Thank you dear master; “Ms. Azimi” said that cross was hanging on Muawiyah’s neck while dying.

Ayatollah “Qazwini”:

This sentence is written in some of narratives. But I don’t know if this narrative is authentic or not! But there is authentic narrative that “Muawiyah” would sell idol and would send ship full of idol for sale.

And there is also narrative with authentic document that he would drink and sell wine.

As commander of the faithful Ali [AS] says: this person didn’t become Muslim at all. Currently I don’t remember that narrative that cross was hanging on Muawiyah’s neck while dying.

So, it’s been said about “Muawiyah” with authentic document that he would sell idol, I’ll talk about this act of him in the next session.


Thank you very much. “Behruz” from “Qom” province said that he has a Sunni friend who has said “I’ll become Shia if master “Qazwini” shows from Sunni books that “Yazid” was libertine and would drink wine.” We have many issues in this regard.

Ayatollah “Qazwini”:

There are some issues in this regard in “Al-Bayan wa al-Tabyin” book from “Jahiz” who is amongst Sunni big scholars. He’s the first guy who wrote book against Shia and had denied the courage of commander of the faithful Ali [AS]!!

“Iskafi” who is amongst Sunni big scholars have written book rejecting his book, “Shaikh Mufid” did so, and even he himself {Jahiz} wrote book rejecting his book!! This guy writes in “Al-Bayan wa al-Tabyin”, vol. 2, p 84:

«ثم ولی یزید بن معاویة، ویزید الخمور»

Then “Yazid ibn Muawiyah” became governor, the one who would drink wine a lot.

«المأبون فی فرجه»

I don’t dare translating this part!!

«فعلیه لعنة الله وملائکته»

And “Al-Dhahabi” who is amongst Sunni scientific pillars, says in “Siyar a’lam al-Nubala’” book, vol. 4, p 37:

«وکان ناصبیا، فظا، غلیظا، جلفا یتناول المسکر، ویفعل المنکر»

“Yazid” was “Nasibi”, impolite, jaunty and would drink water and do evil works.

It’s written in “The History of Damascene” book, vol. 27, p 429 from “Ibn Asakir”: when some of people of “Medina” including “Muhajirin”, “Ansar” and Sahaba in Sham met “Yazid” and returned, speechified in “Medina”:

«ان رجلا ینکح الأمهات والبنات والأخوات ویشرب الخمر ویدع الصلاة»

This man would marry his mother and daughters and sisters and drink wine and wouldn’t say prayer.

And it’s also written in “History of caliphs” book about “Yazid” quoted by “Abdullah Ibn Hanzala”:

«إنه رجل ینکح أمهات الأولاد، والبنات، والأخوات، ویشرب الخمر، ویدع الصلاة»

“Suyuti”- history of caliphs- vol. 1, p 159


I know 25- 30 Sunni books in which it’s written that “Yazid” would drink wine. I’m wondering that this dear Sunni wants to prove it, it’s as clear as daylight.

And there are also narratives show that “Muawiyah” would drink and deal wine. But some have different opinions in this regard. In fact, “Muawiyah ibn Abu Sufyan” the main factor of deviating religion from its main way.


“Ali” from “Sirjan” province asked about aversion from commander of the faithful Ali [AS]’s enemies.

Ayatollah “Qazwini”:

We believe that saying the name {while insulting that guy} is Haram and illegitimate.

Late “Saduq” says in “I’tiqadat” book p 107 and also Allameh “Majlisi” in “Behar al-Anwar” book, vol. 71, p 217, have said a narrative from Imam “Sadiq” [AS] that when he hears that someone is insulting and says that guy’s name clearly, he gets mad and says: May god damn him!

Without saying name, you say: May god damn all the enemies of Muhammad [PBUH] and his “Ahl al-Bayt”. This is what both Shia and Sunni say and even fair Wahhabis say: god! Damn the enemies of Muhammad [PBUH] and his dynasty.

Some guys seek making dissension between Shia and Sunni and say discuss some invalid narratives.

You show us an authentic narrative in which Imam “Sadiq” [AS] was sitting on the pulpit or in the mosque and he began saying the name of some of Sahaba and then  put curse on them.


Thank dear master and viewers, goodbye.



* Name:
* Email:
* Comment :
* Security code:

Latest Articles
Index | Contact us | Archive | Search | Link | List Comments | About us | RSS | Mobile | urdu | فارسی | العربیة |